Saturday, December 26, 2009
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards
Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards
The requirement to establish a procedure for periodically evaluating compliance with applicable legal and other requirements falls short of specifically requiring regulatory compliance audits but, in fact, a system of regular regulatory compliance audits may be the most practical means for meeting this requirement of the standard. In the U.S., determination of whether to conduct a compliance audit will be governed in part by the particular jurisdiction’s approach to allowing a legal privilege for the self-assessment audit.
Evaluation vs. Audit – The difference between an evaluation and audit can only be determined by looking outside of ISO 14001. Consulting a dictionary reveals that an evaluation involves a determination of value or worth and that an audit is an examination of accounts done by persons appointed for the purpose. A better definition `is the more specific ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing, which defines an audit as a “systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled.” Many organizations do not have a system for evaluating regulatory compliance other than their own records and the inspections of regulatory officials. This lack of a verification system can be a risky way to operate. Reports of enforcement actions and consent agreements show that many organizations are blindsided by rogue employees who violate rules and falsify documents to cover up environmental misdeeds. Although ISO 14001 does not prescribe a specific approach to evaluation of regulatory compliance, organizations should consider methods for going beyond verification of records by collecting and evaluating physical evidence.
ISO 9000 Standards – Document Approval
ISO 9000 Standards – Document Approval
The ISO 9000 Standards requires that documents be approved for adequacy prior to issue.
Approval prior to issue means that designated authorities have agreed the document before being made available for use. Whilst the term ade-
quacy is a little vague it should be taken as meaning that the document is judged as fit for the intended purpose. In a paper based system, this means approval before the document is distributed. With an electronic system, it means that the documents should be approved before they are published or made available to the user community.
The ISO 9000 Standards document control process needs to define the process by which documents are approved. In some cases it may not be necessary for anyone other than the approval authority to examine the documents. In others it may be necessary to set up a panel of reviewers to solicit their comments before approval is given.
It all depends on whether the approval authority has all the information
needed to make the decision and is therefore ‘competent’. One might think that the CEO could approve any document in the organization but just because a person is the most senior executive does not mean he or she is competent to perform any role in the organization.
Users should be the prime participants in the approval process so that the
resultant documents reflect their needs and are fit for the intended purpose. If the objective is stated in the document, does it fulfil that objective? If it is stated that the document applies to certain equipment, area or activity, does it cover that equipment, area or activity to the depth expected of such a document? One of the difficulties in soliciting comments to documents is that you will gather comment on what you have written but not on what you have omitted. A useful method is to ensure that the procedures requiring the document specify the acceptance criteria so that the reviewers and approvers can check the document against an agreed standard.
To demonstrate documents have been deemed as adequate prior to issue,
you will need to show that the document has been processed through the
prescribed document approval process. Where there is a review panel, a simple method is to employ a standard comment sheet on which reviewers can indicate their comments or signify that they have no comment. During the drafting process you may undertake several revisions. You may feel it
necessary to retain these in case of dispute later, but you are not required to do so. You also need to show that the current issue has been reviewed so your comment sheets need to indicate document issue status.
Documents That Ensure Effective Planning, Operation And Control
Documents That Ensure Effective Planning, Operation And Control
The ISO 9000 standard requires management system documentation to include documents required by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes.
The documents required for effective planning, operation and control of the processes would include several different types of documents. Some will be
product and process specific and others will be common to all processes. Rather than stipulate the documents that are needed, ISO 9000 Standards now provides for the organization to decide what it needs for the effective operation and control of its processes. This phrase is the key to determining the documents that are needed.
There are three types of controlled documents, namely:
- Policies and practices (these include process descriptions, control procedures, guides, operating procedures and internal standards)
- Documents derived from these policies and practices, such as drawings,
specifications, plans, work instructions, technical procedures and reports
- External documents referenced in either of the above
There will always be exceptions to this model but in general the majority of
documents used in a management system can be classified in this way.
Derived documents are those that are derived by executing processes;
for example, audit reports result from using the audit process, drawings result from using the design process, procurement specifications result from using the procurement process. There are, however, two types of derived document:
prescriptive and descriptive documents. Prescriptive documents are those that prescribe requirements, instructions, guidance etc. and may be subject to change. They have issue status and approval status, and are implemented in doing work. Descriptive documents result from doing work and are not
implemented. They may have issue and approval status. Specifications, plans, purchase orders, drawings are all prescriptive whereas audit reports, test reports, inspection records are all descriptive. This distinction is only necessary because the controls required will be different for each class of documents.
The History Of ISO 14001 Environmental Management System
The History Establishment Of ISO 14001 Environmental Management System
Environmental management began in earnest around 1970 as a direct result of environmental catastrophes and governmental reaction to those catastrophes. In many countries, environmental regulations that focus on control of environmentally damaging emissions to air, discharges to water, and disposal of hazardous wastes were instituted in an effort to prevent future environmental catastrophes and to limit toxic releases to the environment. Regulations, however, too often had the effect of placing a ceiling on environmental performance. Many industrial organizations, reacting negatively to governmental environmental regulations that
they view as being based on bad science, adding unnecessary costs, or making them uncompetitive in international markets, have restricted their environmental management efforts to complying with regulations and nothing morIn response, global institutions, recognizing the interconnected problems of persistent environmental degradation, growing economic divisions, and associated poverty and hunger, developed programs to begin to bring economic and social goals into balance with ecological and natural resource preservation. In 1992, the Global Environmental Summit, convened in Rio de Janeiro by the United Nations, brought representatives of 178 nations together to endorse Agenda 21: The Program of Action for Sustainable Development. Agenda 21 details the actions that are necessary on the part of organizations of all kinds if sustainability is to be achieved and collapse of economic, environmental, and social systems is to be avoided.
A second global summit, the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), was held in Johannesburg in Summer 2002. In tabulating the results since the Rio summit, the WSSD determined that all environmental trends had experienced further degradation and that the only sustainability gains to be reported were progress against infectious diseases, the global literacy rate, and the greater inclusion of women in society’s activities. The significance of Rio is that it marks the time when much of the world realized that we cannot continue on the same path we have been on. The significance of Johannesburg is the realization that, in spite of enormous effort on the part of many institutions, humankind is losing the battle for sustainability.
ISO 14001 is the EMS Specification developed by the international Organization for Standardization (ISO) of Geneva, Switzerland as a part of the ISO 14000 series ofenvironmental management documents. It was issued as both an International and American National Standard in September 1996. The Second Edition of ISO 14001, ISO 14001:2004, was issued as an International Standard on November 15, 2004 and subsequently as an American National Standard.
ISO 14001 establishes a framework for the conduct of environmental management by requiring the organization to define an Environmental Policy and establish sixteen management procedures that support the policy. Many of the ISO 14001 procedures already exist in some form within organizations and only require modification to meet the requirements of ISO 14001. Other procedures have to be added in their entirety. All of the ISO 14001 procedures represent best management practices as defined by a consensus of the representatives of more than 50 national standards bodies and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) who participated in the development of ISO 14001:1996 from early 1993 through July 1, 1995 and in
the development of the Second Edition from early 2002 until mid-2004.
Thursday, November 26, 2009
History and Evolution of ISO 9000 Standards
Pre ISO 9000
During World War II, there were quality problems in many British industries such as munitions, where bombs were exploding in factories during assembly. The solution adopted to address these quality problems required factories to document their manufacturing procedures and to prove by record-keeping that the procedures were being followed. The standard was BS 5750, and it was known as a management standard because it specified not what to manufacture, but how the manufacturing process was to be managed. In 1987, the British Government persuaded the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) to adopt BS 5750 as an international standard. The international standard was named ISO 9000.
ISO 9000: 1987 Version
ISO 9000:1987 had the same structure as the British Standard BS 5750, with three ‘models’ for quality management systems, the selection of which was based on the scope of activities of the organisation:
• ISO 9001:1987 Model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation, and servicing was for companies and organisations whose activities included the creation of new products
• ISO 9002:1987 Model for quality assurance in production, installation, and servicing had basically the same material as ISO 9001 but without covering the creation of new products.
• ISO 9003:1987 Model for quality assurance in final inspection and test covered only the final inspection of finished product, with no concern for how the product was produced.
ISO 9000:1987 was also influenced by existing U.S. and other Defense Standards (MIL SPECS), and so was well-suited to manufacturing. The emphasis tended to be placed on conformance with procedures rather than the overall process of management—which was likely the actual intent.
ISO 9000:1994 (Year 1994 Revision)
ISO 9000:1994 emphasised quality assurance via preventive actions, instead of just checking final product, and continued to require evidence of compliance with documented procedures. As with the first edition, the down-side was that companies tended to implement its requirements by creating shelf-loads of procedure manuals, and becoming burdened with an ISO bureaucracy. In some companies, adapting and improving processes could actually be impeded by the quality system.
ISO 9000:2000 (Year 2000 Revision)
ISO 9001:2000 combines the three standards 9001, 9002, and 9003 into one, called 9001. Design and development procedures are required only if a company engages in the creation of new products. The 2000 version sought to make a radical change in thinking by placing the concept of process management front and centre (”Process management” was the monitoring and optimising of a company’s tasks and activities, instead of just inspecting the final product). The Year 2000 version also demands involvement by upper executives, in order to integrate quality into the business system and avoid delegation of quality functions to junior administrators. Another goal is to improve effectiveness via process performance metrics — numerical measurement of the effectiveness of tasks and activities. Expectations of continual process improvement and tracking customer satisfaction were made explicit.
ISO 9000:2008 (Year 2008 Revision)
The new ISO 9001:2008 was published on 15 November 2008. ISO 9001:2008 uses the same numbering system as ISO 9001:2000 to organise the standard. As a result, the new ISO 9001:2008 standard looks very much like the old standard. No new requirements have been added. However, some important clarifications and modifications have been made.
As with the release of previous versions, organisations registered to ISO 9001:2000 will be given a period to transition to the ISO 9001:2008 standard, assuming changes are needed.
ISO 9000 — a way of managing for conformance
Quality assurance, according to the Standard, is a way of managing that prevents non-conformance and thus “assures quality”. This is what makes ISO 9000 different from other standards: it is a management standard, not a product standard. It goes beyond product standardisation: it is standardising not what is made but how it is made. To use standards to dictate and control how organisations work was to extend the role of standards to new territory. To take such a step we might have firstly established that any such requirements worked — that they resulted in ways of working which improved performance.
Yet the plausibility of this Standard, and the fact that those who had an interest in maintaining it were (and still are) leading opinion, prevented such enquiries. In simple terms the Standard asks managers to say what they do, do what they say and prove it to a third party.
ISO 9000 (1994) paragraph 1: “The requirements specified are aimed primarily at achieving customer satisfaction by preventing non-conformity at all stages from design through servicing.”
To put it another way, the Standard asserts that preventing non-conformance achieves customer satisfaction. But does it? Of course it matters to customers that a product works. But there is no guarantee that the Standard will ensure even that. Furthermore, customers take a total view of an organisation — how easy it is to do business with — in respect of all things of importance to each and every customer.
ISO 9000 requires managers to “establish and maintain a documented quality system as a means of ensuring that product conforms to specified requirements”. Loosely translated this is “say what you do”. Management is supposed to “define and document its policy for quality . . . including its commitment to quality”.
What management would not declare its commitment to quality? But would they know what it means? Would they argue (as they should) that quality management is a different and better way to do business, or would they believe that ISO 9000 will take care of quality? The Standard encourages managers to think of “quality” and “business as usual” as separate and distinct. It helps managers avoid the revelation that quality means a wholly different view of management. Instead, the organisation “shall appoint a management representative who, irrespective of other responsibilities, shall have defined authority and responsibility” [for ISO 9000]. At a practical level this means only one executive might decide he or she had better learn a thing or two about quality. However, would being responsible for ISO 9000 lead to learning about quality or simply enforcing the ISO 9000 regime in an organisation?
Key to the regime is auditing. The Standard requires organisations to conduct internal quality audits to “verify whether quality activities comply with planned arrangements”. This can be loosely translated as “do you do as you say?” and the purpose of the audit is to see that you do. It was not until the 1994 review that the words were changed to “quality activities and related results”. It was a Standard which was rooted in the philosophy of inspection: fifteen years after its initial promulgation the promoters sought to extend the focus to results. But results or improvements assessed by what means? Inspection. By the time the Standard was adopted world-wide, quality thinking had moved a long way from the philosophy of inspection. It is now understood, at least by a few, that quality is achieved through managing the organisation as a system and using measures which enable managers to improve flow and reduce variation (which we explore in chapters 5 and 7). The defenders argue that there is nothing stopping a company having ISO 9000 and implementing methods for managing flow and reducing variation, but where are such companies? Few of the companies we researched, formally and informally, knew anything about this thinking. The Standard does not talk about it; moreover, the Standard effectively discourages managers from learning about it by representing quality in a different way.
According to ISO 8402 (quality vocabulary), quality is:
“The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.”
Everything we have learned about ISO 9000 suggests that the people who created this definition were thinking about the things which need to be controlled, those things which “bear on its ability . . .”. The builders of the Standard assumed that customer needs would be listed in contractual agreements between the supplier and customer. ISO 9000 has a “make” logic — procedures for “how you do what you do” — and a “control” logic — check to see that it is done. It is a relic of the era when contractual agreements were perceived to be an important device for regulating the behaviour of suppliers. In these ways, ISO 9000 encouraged “planning for quality”.
Planning for quality sounds plausible, but it assumes many things: that the plan is the right plan, that it is feasible, that people will “do it”, that performance will improve. It is an approach which, paradoxically, leads to poor decisions. Planners of quality systems, guided by ISO 9000, start with a view of how the world should be as framed by the Standard. Understanding how an organisation is working, rather than how someone thinks it should, is a far better place from which to start change of any kind.
ISO 9000 Standards – Design and development
ISO 9000 Standards – Design and development
Planning the design and development of a product means determining the design objectives and the design strategy, the design stages, timescales, costs, resources and responsibilities needed to accomplish
them. Sometimes the activity of design itself is considered to be a planning activity but what is being planned is not the design but the product.
The purpose of planning is to determine the provisions needed to achieve an objective. In most cases, these objectives include not only a requirement for a new or modified product but also requirements governing the costs and product introduction timescales (Quality, Cost and Delivery or QCD). Remove these constraints and planning becomes less important but there are few situations when cost and time is not a constraint. It is therefore necessary to work out in advance whether the objective can be achieved within the budget and timescale. One problem with design is that it is often a journey into the unknown and the cost and time it will take cannot always be predicted. It may
in fact result in disaster and either a complete reassessment of the design objective or the technology of the design solution. This has been proven time and again with major international projects such as Concorde, the Channel Tunnel and the International Space Station. Without a best guess these projects would not get off (or under!) the ground and so planning is vital firstly to get the funding and secondly to define the known and unknown so that risks can be assessed and quantified.
Design and development plans need to identify the activities to be performed, by whom they will be perform and when they should commence and be complete. One good technique is to use a network chart (often called a PERT chart), which links all the activities together. Alternatively a bar chart may be adequate. There does need to be some narrative in addition as charts in isolation rarely conveys everything required.
Design and development is not complete until the design has been proven as meeting the design requirements, so in drawing up a design and development plan you will need to cover the planning of design verification and validation activities. The plans should identify as a minimum:
- The design requirements
- The design and development programme showing activities against time
- The work packages and names of those who will execute them (Work
packages are the parcels of work that are to be handed out either internally or to suppliers)
- The work breakdown structure showing the relationship between all the parcels of work
- The reviews to be held for authorizing work to proceed from stage to
stage
- The resources in terms of finance, manpower and facilities
- The risks to success and the plans to minimize them
- The controls that will be exercised to keep the design on course
Planning for all phases at once can be difficult as information for subsequent phases will not be available until earlier phases have been completed. So, your design and development plans may consist of separate documents, one for each phase and each containing some detail of the plans you have made for subsequent phases.
Your design and development plans may also need to be subdivided into
plans for special aspects of the design such as reliability plans, safety plans, electromagnetic compatibility plans, configuration management plans. With simple designs there may be only one person carrying out the design activities. As the design and development plan needs to identify all design and development activities, even in this situation you will need to identify who carries out the design, who will review the design and who will verify the design. The same person may perform both the design and the design verification activities, however, it is good practice to allocate design verification to another person or organization because it will reveal problems overlooked by the designer. On larger design projects you may need to employ staff of various disciplines such as mechanical engineers, electronic engineers, reliability engineers etc. The responsibilities of all these people or groups need to be identified and a useful way of parcelling up the work is to use work packages that list all the activities to be performed by a particular group. If you subcontract any of the design activities, the supplier’s plans need to be integrated with your plans and your plan should identify which activities are the supplier’s responsibility. While purchasing is dealt with in clause 7.4 of the standard, the requirements also apply to design activities.
Thursday, November 12, 2009
ISO 14001 Standards Audit
ISO 14001:2004 emphasizes the continuous improvement of an environmental management system (EMS). The standard specifies requirements for an environmental management system to enable an organization to develop and implement a policy and objectives which take into account legal requirements and information about significant environmental aspects. The certification process ensures the conformance of your EMS against the international standard, as well as any organizational specific requirements that have been identified.
The ISO 14001 Standards audit consist of 2 stage registration audit process followed by surveillanceaudits, and ultimately a recertification audit. ISO 14001 Audits include on-site assessments of documents, data, records, activity and personnel. Process audit trails are followed by interviews of personnel responsible for the tasks and reviewing associated activity and records of occurrence. The audit trail will follow interactions between processes as well as the details of the process itself. Following are the stages of the audit process.
Pre-assessmentRegistration Audit – Stage 2Audit Findings• A review of action taken on nonconformities identified during the previous audit• A review of the continued effectiveness of the management system in its entiretyThe continued applicability to the scope of registration
The pre-assessment audit is an optional activity, outside of the registration process, it is highly encourages that any organization to undertake to evaluate the readiness to undergo the two stage registration process. That would optimally occur prior to the stage 1 and 2 audits.
Unlike the Stage 1 and Stage 2 activities you have full discretion as to which areas the preassessment should focus on and for the length of the pre-assessment. This activity allows your organization to become familiar with the audit process and helps prepare your employees for the registration assessment.
The auditor conducting the pre-assessment will typically return to the organization for the assessment. Similar to a ‘true’ audit, the end result of the pre-assessment will be a documented report identifying findings observed during the audit and a closing meeting to discuss the issues.
The pre-assessment activity allows you to correct any issues prior to beginning the registration process.
Assessment
New requirements for certification bodies have changed the registration process. Registration is now conducted in two distinct visits- Stage One and Stage Two- each of which has defined requirements that are outlined below.
Registration Audit – Stage 1
The stage 1 audit, conducted at your facility, is primarily performed for planning and determining the readiness of an organization to undergo a stage 2 registration audit. It also facilitates communicating any needs and expectations to the organization. Activities performed at a stage 1 audit include:
• Conducting a documentation review – This review determines if the organization’s EMS documentation adequately covers all the requirements of the ISO standard
• A review of the aspects and impacts and their significance and an evaluation of the facility(s) site specific conditions
• A review of your organizations non-conformance, preventive and corrective action system • An overview of applicable regulations
• Interviewing your organization’s personnel to assess their general readiness to undertake a stage 2 audit
• Confirming the applicability of the scope of the organization’s EMS
• Obtaining evidence that internal audits and management reviews are being planned and performed
• Providing focus for the planning of the stage 2 audit
If during the stage 1 audit any nonconformities are identified, the auditor will request a corrective action response (see Corrective Action Response).
The objective of the Stage 2 on-site audit is to assess your organizations’ adherence to your own policies, objectives, and procedures and to ascertain conformance to the requirements of the ISO 14001 standard. To accomplish this, the audit will address the implementation of all the elements of the standard. Review of documentation and records to support the implementation is an expected part of the assessment process. If non-conformances or opportunities for improvement are identified they will be documented in a report which will be presented to the organization during the closing meeting. The report will include the auditor’s recommendation regarding registration.
Any deviation from procedures or requirements of the standard will be identified as an audit finding, which will be documented in the audit report. The auditor will draw your attention to non-conformities as they arise so there will be no “surprises” at the closing meeting. Findings are categorized into three categories defined as follows:
• A major non-conformity relates to the absence or total breakdown of a required process or a number of minor non-conformities listed against similar areas. A major non-conformity at the Registration Audit – Stage 2 would defer recommendation for registration until that major has been closed.
• A minor non-conformity is an observed lapse in your systems ability to meet the requirements of the standard or your internal systems, while the overall process remains in tact.
• An observation or opportunity for improvement relates to a matter about which the Auditor is concerned but which cannot be clearly stated as a non-conformity. Observations also indicate trends which may result in a future non-conformity.
Corrective Action Response
ISO 14001 Standards requires corrective action responses from all Registration Audits. Once certification is achieved, dependant upon the extent and nature of the findings, your organization may be required to submit a corrective action plan, detailing your intent to correct the non conformity.
The auditor may also recommend that your organization submit objective evidence to support the to verify closure may be required.
It is recommended that all non-conformities are addressed within your internal corrective action system. Typically, opportunities for improvement would be addressed as preventive actions by your organization.
closure of the finding. In certain circumstances such as a major non conformity an on site activity
Surveillance Audits
Company shall conduct Surveillance Audits on an annual or semi-annual basis. The purpose of the Surveillance Audit is to ensure that the EMS continues to conform to both the organizations’ and the ISO 14001 requirements. Certain processes will be reviewed at each surveillance including:
• Internal audits and management review
• Customer and interested parties communications
• Effectiveness of the management system in achieving defined objectives
• The progress of planned continual improvement activities
• Continuing operational control
• A review of any changes made by the organization which may have impact on the registration
• Use of accreditation and certification body logos provided to the organization upon registration
• objectives, targets and programs
• evaluation of compliance
Re-assessment Audits
The accreditation body requires that a recertification audit be carried out every three years. The purpose of the recertification audit is to confirm the continued conformity and effectiveness of the management system as a whole, and its continued relevance and applicability for the scope of activity.
Recertification audits review the performance of the EMS over the registration period, and include a review of previous surveillance audit records. The recertification audit includes the following:
• The continued relevancy of the organization’s policy and objectives
• The continued effective interaction between the processes of the management system
• A review of internal audits, management reviews, document changes during this certification period
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Benefits Of Obtaining ISO 9000 Certification
Benefits Of Obtaining ISO 9000 Certification
Implementing a quality management system brings internal benefits to most organizations, as well as opening up opportunities vis-à-vis the outside world.
Internal benefits to the company include:
• improved customer focus and process orientation within the company;
• improved management commitment and decision-making;
• better working conditions for employees;
• increased motivation of employees;
• reduced cost of internal failures (lower rates of rework, rejection, etc.) and external failures (fewer customer returns, replacements, etc.); and last but not least,
• continual improvement of the quality management system.
The following external benefits are generated:
• customers are more confident that they will receive products conforming to their requirements, which in turn results in higher customer satisfaction;
• an improved image of the company;
• more aggressive publicity, as customers can be informed of the benefits of their doing business with a company that manages the quality of its outputs;
• more confidence that the company’s products meet relevant regulatory
requirements;
• better objective evidence to defend product liability charges if such are brought by customers.
Refer http://www.iso9001-standard.us for more information.
Implementing a quality management system brings internal benefits to most organizations, as well as opening up opportunities vis-à-vis the outside world.
Internal benefits to the company include:
• improved customer focus and process orientation within the company;
• improved management commitment and decision-making;
• better working conditions for employees;
• increased motivation of employees;
• reduced cost of internal failures (lower rates of rework, rejection, etc.) and external failures (fewer customer returns, replacements, etc.); and last but not least,
• continual improvement of the quality management system.
The following external benefits are generated:
• customers are more confident that they will receive products conforming to their requirements, which in turn results in higher customer satisfaction;
• an improved image of the company;
• more aggressive publicity, as customers can be informed of the benefits of their doing business with a company that manages the quality of its outputs;
• more confidence that the company’s products meet relevant regulatory
requirements;
• better objective evidence to defend product liability charges if such are brought by customers.
Refer http://www.iso9001-standard.us for more information.
Implementing A Quality Management System
Implementing A Quality Management System
An ISO 9000:2008 quality management system can be implemented by following the steps detailed as follows:
1. Evaluate the organization’s need/goals for implementing a QMS Need may arise from repeated customer complaints; frequent warranty returns; delayed deliveries; high inventories; frequent production hold-ups; and high level of rework or rejection of products or services.
At this stage, identify the goals which you would like to achieve through a QMS, such as customer satisfaction, increased market share, improved communications and morale in the organization, greater efficiency and profitability, etc. Another objective in implementing a QMS may be a demonstration of compliance through third party certification, which may be requested by an important client or required for enlisting as a supplier to large companies, e.g., original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).
2. Obtain information about the ISO 9000 family
The persons identified for initiating the development of an ISO 9000 QMS need tounderstand the requirements of ISO 9001:2008 as read with ISO 9000:2000 and ISO 9001:2008.
Supporting information such as quality management principles, frequently asked questions (FAQs), guidance on clause 1.2 (application) of ISO 9001:2008, guidance on documentation requirements of ISO 9001:2008 and other brochures are available free of charge on the ISO web site;
3. Appoint a consultant, if necessary
If, within the organization, you do not have adequate competence to develop a QMS, you may appoint a consultant. Before doing so, it is good to check his/her background; knowledge about the product realization processes of your organization; and experience in helping other organizations to achieve their stated goals, including certification.
Carry out a cost-benefit analysis of hiring a consultant and agree the scope of his/her work in writing. It is also possible to appoint a consultant only for the training of key staff; the latter can then carry out further training and development of the system.
4. Awareness and training
Raise awareness about QMS requirements amongst all personnel performing activities that affect quality. Plan for and provide specific training on how to develop Quality Manuals; on procedures; on QMS planning; on how to identify and implement improvement processes; and on how to audit compliance with the QMS, etc.
The Institute of Quality Assurance (IQA), the American Society for Quality (ASQ)and the International Auditor and Training Certification Association (IATCA) can provide lists of training organizations.
5. Gap analysis
Evaluate gaps between your existing quality management system and the QMS requirements of ISO 9001. Prepare how to bridge these gaps, including by planning for any additional resources required. Gap analysis may be carried out through selfassessment or by the external consultant.
6. Product realization processes
Review clause 7 of ISO 9001:2008 relating to “Product realization” to determine how the requirements apply or do not apply to your company’s QMS.
The processes covered by this clause include:
• Customer-related processes
• Design and development
• Purchasing
• Production and service provision
• Control of measuring and monitoring devices
Note that if your company is not responsible for preparing the design of your product, you can exclude the requirement for “design and development” from your QMS and explain the reasons for doing so in your Quality Manual.
7. Staffing
Decide on the responsibilities of the persons who will be involved in developing and documenting the QMS, including the appointment of a management representative who will oversee the implementation of the QMS. Establishing a project Steering Committee may also prove useful to oversee progress and provide resources wherever required.
8. Planning a time frame
Prepare a complete plan to close the gaps identified in Step 5 to develop the QMS processes. In the plan, include activities to be performed, resources required, responsibilities and an estimated completion time for each activity. Clauses 4.1 and
7.1 of ISO 9001:2008 provide information that should be used when developing the plan. The total time required for each phase (planning, documentation, implementation and evaluation) depends on the extent of the gaps in your existing QMS.
9. Draft a Quality Manual
In your Quality Manual;
• Include how the QMS applies to the products, processes, locations and departments of the organization;
• Exclude any requirement with justification for doing so as decided in step 6
above;
• Refer to or include documented procedures for QMS;
• Describe the interaction between the processes of the QMS, e.g., the interaction between product realization processes and other management, measurement and improvement processes; and
• Draft the quality policy and quality objectives for the organization.
The staff concerned in the organization should review the Quality Manual and the documented procedures so that their comments and suggestions can be taken into account before the Quality Manual and procedures are approved for issue and use.
The effective date of implementation should also be decided.
10. Carry out internal audits
During the phase of implementation of some three to six months after the documentation has been written, the trained auditors should carry out one or two internal audits covering all activities for the QMS, and concerned management should take corrective action on the audit findings without delay. Wherever required, revise the manuals, procedures and objectives. After each internal audit, the top management should review the effectiveness of the system and provide necessary resources for corrective actions and improvements.
11. Apply for certification
On satisfactory completion of Step 10, and if your company decides to obtain third party certification, you can make an application for certification to an accredited certification body. The certification audit process is explained section VII.
12. Conduct periodic evaluations
After certification, the organization should periodically conduct internal audits to review the effectiveness of the QMS and see how it can be “continually improved”. The organization should evaluate periodically if the purpose and goals (see Step 1) for which the QMS was developed are being achieved, including its continual improvement.
An ISO 9000:2008 quality management system can be implemented by following the steps detailed as follows:
1. Evaluate the organization’s need/goals for implementing a QMS Need may arise from repeated customer complaints; frequent warranty returns; delayed deliveries; high inventories; frequent production hold-ups; and high level of rework or rejection of products or services.
At this stage, identify the goals which you would like to achieve through a QMS, such as customer satisfaction, increased market share, improved communications and morale in the organization, greater efficiency and profitability, etc. Another objective in implementing a QMS may be a demonstration of compliance through third party certification, which may be requested by an important client or required for enlisting as a supplier to large companies, e.g., original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).
2. Obtain information about the ISO 9000 family
The persons identified for initiating the development of an ISO 9000 QMS need tounderstand the requirements of ISO 9001:2008 as read with ISO 9000:2000 and ISO 9001:2008.
Supporting information such as quality management principles, frequently asked questions (FAQs), guidance on clause 1.2 (application) of ISO 9001:2008, guidance on documentation requirements of ISO 9001:2008 and other brochures are available free of charge on the ISO web site;
3. Appoint a consultant, if necessary
If, within the organization, you do not have adequate competence to develop a QMS, you may appoint a consultant. Before doing so, it is good to check his/her background; knowledge about the product realization processes of your organization; and experience in helping other organizations to achieve their stated goals, including certification.
Carry out a cost-benefit analysis of hiring a consultant and agree the scope of his/her work in writing. It is also possible to appoint a consultant only for the training of key staff; the latter can then carry out further training and development of the system.
4. Awareness and training
Raise awareness about QMS requirements amongst all personnel performing activities that affect quality. Plan for and provide specific training on how to develop Quality Manuals; on procedures; on QMS planning; on how to identify and implement improvement processes; and on how to audit compliance with the QMS, etc.
The Institute of Quality Assurance (IQA), the American Society for Quality (ASQ)and the International Auditor and Training Certification Association (IATCA) can provide lists of training organizations.
5. Gap analysis
Evaluate gaps between your existing quality management system and the QMS requirements of ISO 9001. Prepare how to bridge these gaps, including by planning for any additional resources required. Gap analysis may be carried out through selfassessment or by the external consultant.
6. Product realization processes
Review clause 7 of ISO 9001:2008 relating to “Product realization” to determine how the requirements apply or do not apply to your company’s QMS.
The processes covered by this clause include:
• Customer-related processes
• Design and development
• Purchasing
• Production and service provision
• Control of measuring and monitoring devices
Note that if your company is not responsible for preparing the design of your product, you can exclude the requirement for “design and development” from your QMS and explain the reasons for doing so in your Quality Manual.
7. Staffing
Decide on the responsibilities of the persons who will be involved in developing and documenting the QMS, including the appointment of a management representative who will oversee the implementation of the QMS. Establishing a project Steering Committee may also prove useful to oversee progress and provide resources wherever required.
8. Planning a time frame
Prepare a complete plan to close the gaps identified in Step 5 to develop the QMS processes. In the plan, include activities to be performed, resources required, responsibilities and an estimated completion time for each activity. Clauses 4.1 and
7.1 of ISO 9001:2008 provide information that should be used when developing the plan. The total time required for each phase (planning, documentation, implementation and evaluation) depends on the extent of the gaps in your existing QMS.
9. Draft a Quality Manual
In your Quality Manual;
• Include how the QMS applies to the products, processes, locations and departments of the organization;
• Exclude any requirement with justification for doing so as decided in step 6
above;
• Refer to or include documented procedures for QMS;
• Describe the interaction between the processes of the QMS, e.g., the interaction between product realization processes and other management, measurement and improvement processes; and
• Draft the quality policy and quality objectives for the organization.
The staff concerned in the organization should review the Quality Manual and the documented procedures so that their comments and suggestions can be taken into account before the Quality Manual and procedures are approved for issue and use.
The effective date of implementation should also be decided.
10. Carry out internal audits
During the phase of implementation of some three to six months after the documentation has been written, the trained auditors should carry out one or two internal audits covering all activities for the QMS, and concerned management should take corrective action on the audit findings without delay. Wherever required, revise the manuals, procedures and objectives. After each internal audit, the top management should review the effectiveness of the system and provide necessary resources for corrective actions and improvements.
11. Apply for certification
On satisfactory completion of Step 10, and if your company decides to obtain third party certification, you can make an application for certification to an accredited certification body. The certification audit process is explained section VII.
12. Conduct periodic evaluations
After certification, the organization should periodically conduct internal audits to review the effectiveness of the QMS and see how it can be “continually improved”. The organization should evaluate periodically if the purpose and goals (see Step 1) for which the QMS was developed are being achieved, including its continual improvement.
ISO 9001 Standards – Management Review
ISO 9001 Standards – Management Review
Review the quality management system at planned intervals to:- Assess possible opportunities for improvementEnsure a suitable, adequate, and effective system
- Evaluate the need for any changes to the system
- Consider the need for changes to the quality policy and objectives
Maintain records of the management reviews.
Inputs for management review must include information on:
- Results of audits
- Customer feedback
- Process performance and product conformity
- Status of preventive and corrective actions
- Follow-up actions from earlier reviews
- Changes that could affect the quality system
- Recommendations for improvement
Outputs from the management review must include any decisions and actions related to:
- Improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system and its processes
- Improvement of product related to customer requirements
- Resource needs
Review the quality management system at planned intervals to:- Assess possible opportunities for improvementEnsure a suitable, adequate, and effective system
- Evaluate the need for any changes to the system
- Consider the need for changes to the quality policy and objectives
Maintain records of the management reviews.
Inputs for management review must include information on:
- Results of audits
- Customer feedback
- Process performance and product conformity
- Status of preventive and corrective actions
- Follow-up actions from earlier reviews
- Changes that could affect the quality system
- Recommendations for improvement
Outputs from the management review must include any decisions and actions related to:
- Improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system and its processes
- Improvement of product related to customer requirements
- Resource needs
ISO 9001 Standards – Design and Development
ISO 9001 Standards - Design and Development
Plan and control the product design and development. This planning must determine the:Identify problems and propose any necessary actions
- Stages of design and development
- Appropriate review, verification, and validation activities for each stage
- Responsibility and authority for design and development
The interfaces between the different involved groups must be managed to ensure effective communication and the clear assignment of responsibility. Update, as appropriate, the planning output during design and development.
NOTE: Design and development review, verification, and validation have distinct purposes. They can be conducted and recorded separately or in any combination, as deemed suitable for the product and the organization.
Determine product requirement inputs and maintain records. The inputs must include:
- Functional and performance requirements
- Applicable statutory and regulatory requirements
- Applicable information derived from similar designs
- Requirements essential for design and development
Review these inputs for adequacy. Resolve any incomplete, ambiguous, or conflicting requirements.
Document the outputs of the design and development process in a form suitable for verification against the inputs to the process. The outputs must:
- Meet design and development input requirements
- Provide information for purchasing, production, and service
- Contain or reference product acceptance criteria
- Define essential characteristics for safe and proper use
- Be approved before their release
Perform systematic reviews of design and development at suitable stages in accordance with planned arrangements to:
- Evaluate the ability of the results to meet requirements
- The reviews must include representatives of the functions concerned with the stage being reviewed. Maintain the results of reviews and subsequent follow-up actions.
Plan and control the product design and development. This planning must determine the:Identify problems and propose any necessary actions
- Stages of design and development
- Appropriate review, verification, and validation activities for each stage
- Responsibility and authority for design and development
The interfaces between the different involved groups must be managed to ensure effective communication and the clear assignment of responsibility. Update, as appropriate, the planning output during design and development.
NOTE: Design and development review, verification, and validation have distinct purposes. They can be conducted and recorded separately or in any combination, as deemed suitable for the product and the organization.
Determine product requirement inputs and maintain records. The inputs must include:
- Functional and performance requirements
- Applicable statutory and regulatory requirements
- Applicable information derived from similar designs
- Requirements essential for design and development
Review these inputs for adequacy. Resolve any incomplete, ambiguous, or conflicting requirements.
Document the outputs of the design and development process in a form suitable for verification against the inputs to the process. The outputs must:
- Meet design and development input requirements
- Provide information for purchasing, production, and service
- Contain or reference product acceptance criteria
- Define essential characteristics for safe and proper use
- Be approved before their release
Perform systematic reviews of design and development at suitable stages in accordance with planned arrangements to:
- Evaluate the ability of the results to meet requirements
- The reviews must include representatives of the functions concerned with the stage being reviewed. Maintain the results of reviews and subsequent follow-up actions.
ISO 9001 Standards – Control of Measuring and Monitoring Equipment
ISO 9001 Standards - Control of Measuring and Monitoring Equipment
Determine the monitoring and measurements to be made, and the required equipment, to provide evidence of product conformity. Use and control the monitoring and measuring devices to ensure that measurement capability is consistent with monitoring and measurement requirements.
Where necessary to ensure valid results:
- Calibrate and/or verify the measuring equipment at specified intervals or prior to use
- Calibrate the equipment to national or international standards (or record other basis)
- Adjust or re-adjust as necessary
- Identify the measuring equipment in order to determine its calibration status
- Safeguard them from improper adjustments
- Protect them from damage and deterioration
Assess and record the validity of prior results if the device is found to not conform to requirements. Maintain records of the calibration and verification results.
Confirm the ability of software used for monitoring and measuring for the intended application before its initial use (and reconfirmed as necessary).
NOTE: Confirming the ability of software to satisfy the intended application would typically include its verification and configuration management to maintain its suitability for use.
For More Information Please Visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us
Determine the monitoring and measurements to be made, and the required equipment, to provide evidence of product conformity. Use and control the monitoring and measuring devices to ensure that measurement capability is consistent with monitoring and measurement requirements.
Where necessary to ensure valid results:
- Calibrate and/or verify the measuring equipment at specified intervals or prior to use
- Calibrate the equipment to national or international standards (or record other basis)
- Adjust or re-adjust as necessary
- Identify the measuring equipment in order to determine its calibration status
- Safeguard them from improper adjustments
- Protect them from damage and deterioration
Assess and record the validity of prior results if the device is found to not conform to requirements. Maintain records of the calibration and verification results.
Confirm the ability of software used for monitoring and measuring for the intended application before its initial use (and reconfirmed as necessary).
NOTE: Confirming the ability of software to satisfy the intended application would typically include its verification and configuration management to maintain its suitability for use.
For More Information Please Visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us
ISO 14001:2004 Standards Contents
ISO 14001:2004 Standards
ISO 14000 is a series of international standards on environmental management. It provides a framework for the development of an environmental management system and the supporting audit programme.
The main thrust for its development came as a result of the Rio Summit on the Environment held in 1992.
ISO 14000 is an Environmental Management System (EMS), which requires that an organization consider the environmental aspects of its products and services.
Iso14000 approach forces you to take a hard look at all areas of your business that has an environmental impact.
Iso14000 is the world’s first series of Internationally accepted Standards for Environmental Management Systems (EMS).
Iso14000 elevates Environmental Management to a Strategic Level that can be applied to any organization, from any industry, anywhere in the world.
ISO 14000 is a series of voluntary standards and guideline reference documents.
The part of the overall management system that includes organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy.
Iso14000 is the world’s first series of Internationally accepted Standards for Environmental Management Systems (EMS).
Iso14000 elevates Environmental Management to a Strategic Level that can be applied to any organization, from any industry, anywhere in the world.
ISO 14000 is a series of voluntary standards and guideline reference documents.
The part of the overall management system that includes organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy.
ISO 14000 is an Environmental Management System (EMS) who’s purpose is:
· A management commitment to pollution prevention.
· An understanding of the environmental impacts (reducing) of an organization’s activities.
A commitment (pollution prevention) to employees, neighbors and customers
ISO 14001 is the corner stone standard of the ISO 14000 series. It specifies a framework of control for an Environmental Management System against which an organization can be certified by a third party.
The environment cannot be protected by our convictions or goodwill alone. Efforts to protect the environment must be planned, coordinated and organized into a system, such as ISO 14001.
ISO14001 requires an Environmental Policy to be in existence within the organisation, fully supported by senior management, and outlining the policies of the company, not only to the staff but to the public. The policy needs to clarify compliance with Environmental Legislation that may effect the organization and stress a commitment to continuous improvement. Emphasis has been placed on policy as this provides the direction for the remainder of the Management System.
Those companies who have witnessed ISO9000 Assessments will know that the policy is frequently discussed during the assessment, many staff are asked if they understand or are aware of the policy, and any problems associated with the policy are seldom serious. The Environmental Policy is different, this provides the initial foundation and direction for the Management System and will be more stringently reviewed than a similar ISO9000 policy. The statement must be publicised in non-technical language so that it can be understood by the majority of readers. It should relate to the sites within the organisation encompassed by the Management System, it should provide an overview of the company’s activities on the site and a description of those activities. A clear picture of the company’s operations.
The preparatory review and definition of the organization’s environmental effects is not part of a ISO14001 Assessment, however examination of this data will provide an external audit with a wealth of information on the methods adopted by the company. The preparatory review itself should be comprehensive in consideration of input processes and output at the site. This review should be designed to identify all relevant environmental aspects that may arise from existence on the site. These may relate to current operations, they may relate to future, perhaps even unplanned future activities, and they will certainly relate to the activities performed on site in the past (i.e. contamination of land).
The initial or preparatory review will also include a wide-ranging consideration of the legislation which may effect the site, whether it is currently being complied with, and perhaps even whether copies of the legislation are available. Many of the environmental assessments undertaken already have highlighted that companies are often unaware of ALL of the legislation that affects them, and being unaware, are often not meeting the requirements of that legislation.
The company will declare its primary environmental objectives, those that can have most environmental impact. In order to gain most benefit these will become the primary areas of consideration within the improvement process, and the company’s environmental program. The program will be the plan to achieve specific goals or targets along the route to a specific goal and describe the means to reach those objectives such that they are real and achievable. The Environmental Management System provides further detail on the environmental program. The EMS establishes procedures, work instructions and controls to ensure that implementation of the policy and achievement of the targets can become a reality. Communication is a vital factor, enabling people in the organisation to be aware of their responsibilities, aware of the objectives of the scheme, and able to contribute to its success.
As with ISO9000 the Environmental Management System requires a planned comprehensive periodic audit of the Environmental Management System to ensure that it is effective in operation, is meeting specified goals, and the system continues to perform in accordance with relevant regulations and standards. The audits are designed to provide additional information in order to exercise effective management of the system, providing information on practices which differ to the current procedures or offer an opportunity for improvement.
In addition to audit, there is a requirement for Management Review of the system to ensure that it is suitable (for the organization and the objectives) and effective in operation. The management review is the ideal forum to make decisions on howe to improve for the future.
The newly revised ISO 14001:2004 specifies the requirements for an environmental management system (EMS), which provides a framework for an organization to control the environmental impacts of its activities, products and services, and to continually improve its environmental performance. It applies to those environmental aspects which the organization can control and over which it can be expected to have an influence. It does not itself state specific environmental performance criteria. ISO 14001:2004 is applicable to any organization that wishes to:
· implement, maintain and improve an environmental management system
· assure itself of its conformance with its stated environmental policy
· demonstrate such conformance to others
· seek certification/registration of its environmental management system by an external organization
· make a self-determination and self-declaration of conformance with this international standard.
All the requirements in this standard can be incorporated into any environmental management system. Having been revised, the improved ISO 14001 is now expected to bring the benefits of implementing an EMS to more businesses than ever. The standard is now easier to understand and use and has more detailed checklists for inputs and outputs from the management review and has increased compatibility to ISO 9001. Organizations who are currently registered to ISO 14001:1996 will have an 18-month transition period to register to ISO 14001:2004.
ISO 14000 is a series of international standards on environmental management. It provides a framework for the development of an environmental management system and the supporting audit programme.
The main thrust for its development came as a result of the Rio Summit on the Environment held in 1992.
ISO 14000 is an Environmental Management System (EMS), which requires that an organization consider the environmental aspects of its products and services.
Iso14000 approach forces you to take a hard look at all areas of your business that has an environmental impact.
Iso14000 is the world’s first series of Internationally accepted Standards for Environmental Management Systems (EMS).
Iso14000 elevates Environmental Management to a Strategic Level that can be applied to any organization, from any industry, anywhere in the world.
ISO 14000 is a series of voluntary standards and guideline reference documents.
The part of the overall management system that includes organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy.
Iso14000 is the world’s first series of Internationally accepted Standards for Environmental Management Systems (EMS).
Iso14000 elevates Environmental Management to a Strategic Level that can be applied to any organization, from any industry, anywhere in the world.
ISO 14000 is a series of voluntary standards and guideline reference documents.
The part of the overall management system that includes organizational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy.
ISO 14000 is an Environmental Management System (EMS) who’s purpose is:
· A management commitment to pollution prevention.
· An understanding of the environmental impacts (reducing) of an organization’s activities.
A commitment (pollution prevention) to employees, neighbors and customers
ISO 14001 is the corner stone standard of the ISO 14000 series. It specifies a framework of control for an Environmental Management System against which an organization can be certified by a third party.
The environment cannot be protected by our convictions or goodwill alone. Efforts to protect the environment must be planned, coordinated and organized into a system, such as ISO 14001.
ISO14001 requires an Environmental Policy to be in existence within the organisation, fully supported by senior management, and outlining the policies of the company, not only to the staff but to the public. The policy needs to clarify compliance with Environmental Legislation that may effect the organization and stress a commitment to continuous improvement. Emphasis has been placed on policy as this provides the direction for the remainder of the Management System.
Those companies who have witnessed ISO9000 Assessments will know that the policy is frequently discussed during the assessment, many staff are asked if they understand or are aware of the policy, and any problems associated with the policy are seldom serious. The Environmental Policy is different, this provides the initial foundation and direction for the Management System and will be more stringently reviewed than a similar ISO9000 policy. The statement must be publicised in non-technical language so that it can be understood by the majority of readers. It should relate to the sites within the organisation encompassed by the Management System, it should provide an overview of the company’s activities on the site and a description of those activities. A clear picture of the company’s operations.
The preparatory review and definition of the organization’s environmental effects is not part of a ISO14001 Assessment, however examination of this data will provide an external audit with a wealth of information on the methods adopted by the company. The preparatory review itself should be comprehensive in consideration of input processes and output at the site. This review should be designed to identify all relevant environmental aspects that may arise from existence on the site. These may relate to current operations, they may relate to future, perhaps even unplanned future activities, and they will certainly relate to the activities performed on site in the past (i.e. contamination of land).
The initial or preparatory review will also include a wide-ranging consideration of the legislation which may effect the site, whether it is currently being complied with, and perhaps even whether copies of the legislation are available. Many of the environmental assessments undertaken already have highlighted that companies are often unaware of ALL of the legislation that affects them, and being unaware, are often not meeting the requirements of that legislation.
The company will declare its primary environmental objectives, those that can have most environmental impact. In order to gain most benefit these will become the primary areas of consideration within the improvement process, and the company’s environmental program. The program will be the plan to achieve specific goals or targets along the route to a specific goal and describe the means to reach those objectives such that they are real and achievable. The Environmental Management System provides further detail on the environmental program. The EMS establishes procedures, work instructions and controls to ensure that implementation of the policy and achievement of the targets can become a reality. Communication is a vital factor, enabling people in the organisation to be aware of their responsibilities, aware of the objectives of the scheme, and able to contribute to its success.
As with ISO9000 the Environmental Management System requires a planned comprehensive periodic audit of the Environmental Management System to ensure that it is effective in operation, is meeting specified goals, and the system continues to perform in accordance with relevant regulations and standards. The audits are designed to provide additional information in order to exercise effective management of the system, providing information on practices which differ to the current procedures or offer an opportunity for improvement.
In addition to audit, there is a requirement for Management Review of the system to ensure that it is suitable (for the organization and the objectives) and effective in operation. The management review is the ideal forum to make decisions on howe to improve for the future.
The newly revised ISO 14001:2004 specifies the requirements for an environmental management system (EMS), which provides a framework for an organization to control the environmental impacts of its activities, products and services, and to continually improve its environmental performance. It applies to those environmental aspects which the organization can control and over which it can be expected to have an influence. It does not itself state specific environmental performance criteria. ISO 14001:2004 is applicable to any organization that wishes to:
· implement, maintain and improve an environmental management system
· assure itself of its conformance with its stated environmental policy
· demonstrate such conformance to others
· seek certification/registration of its environmental management system by an external organization
· make a self-determination and self-declaration of conformance with this international standard.
All the requirements in this standard can be incorporated into any environmental management system. Having been revised, the improved ISO 14001 is now expected to bring the benefits of implementing an EMS to more businesses than ever. The standard is now easier to understand and use and has more detailed checklists for inputs and outputs from the management review and has increased compatibility to ISO 9001. Organizations who are currently registered to ISO 14001:1996 will have an 18-month transition period to register to ISO 14001:2004.
ISO 9001 Standards New Blogs
Some of the new blogs on ISO 9001 Standards & ISO 14001 standards was found as below:
http://iso14000standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso-9001-standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001environmentmanagementsystem.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001qualitymanagementsystem.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001qualitymanual.blogspot.com/
http://iso9000standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001-standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso14000standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso-9001-standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001environmentmanagementsystem.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001qualitymanagementsystem.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001qualitymanual.blogspot.com/
http://iso9000standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso9001-standards.blogspot.com/
http://iso14001standards.blogspot.com/
ADVANTAGES ACHIEVED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF Quality Management System
ADVANTAGES ACHIEVED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF Quality Management System (QMS)
- An Romania Perspective
The assurance of quality of the delivered products and services has always represented the main goal of any organisation which wants to be on the market. The concept of „quality” is larger than in the past, referring also to management aspects. Thus, the quality of products and services does not represent only a goal, but a consequence of the quality of the whole managerial activities, workers, and even a quality of partnerships. Modern industrial reorganisations are usually realised through the strategies of quality management, due to the fact that these are able to release the continuous and substantial improvements of the economical agents’ performances.
Within such a frame, one possibility for an organisation to maintain and to gain new positions on a market is to design, to implement and to certificate a Quality Management System (QMS), system through which all processes are controlled.
The Romanian pharmaceutical market is currently restricted as volume and value compared to other countries in the region. Joining the European Union and future improvement of living conditions will mean increase of pharmaceutical expenses per person, considering the fact that the demand for pharmaceutical products (medication) is not influenced by the evolution of prices. After 1990, foreign manufacturers have become interested in the increasing potential of Romania, a country of 22 million inhabitants with a very low intake of drugs per person, due to the low living standard. They have penetrated the market through direct import companies, through license agreements, acquisitions and privatizations.
Romanian manufacturers have tried to shift their direction towards export, but the barrier represented by the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP – for production) and ISO 9001:2000 standards (for distribution) has stopped their penetration of new markets. Their exports mainly targeted Russia, Moldova and former socialist countries. Without norms of this kind, also known as standards, today’s international trade would be inconceivable because every product would have to be checked in keeping with individual criteria. Norms, therefore, create comparability.
Nowadays, the external market has, for several companies, the same importance as the domestic one. The conquest of external market is essential because it brings currency, improves commercial balance, creates new working places and promotes the managerial or technological know-how transfer.
ISO 9000 is a generic name given to a family of standards developed to provide a framework around which a quality management system can be effectively implemented. These standards were developed mainly to facilitate commercial relationships and to increase the confidence of consumers in the capability of a supplier to constantly satisfy the requirements of products and services quality.
The paper presents some advantages achieved by implementation of Quality Management System in pharmaceutical industry, namely S.C. X Company S.A from Tirgu-Mures, one of the most important producer and distributor of pharmaceutical products in Romania.
Using a proven management system combined with ongoing external validation, enables the X Company to continually renew its strategies, domestic and external operations and service level. To this respect, the paper presents the main steps in implementing the Quality Management System within this organisation and some benefits of the registration such as increasing domestic sales, but most off all, the penetration and increasing sales on external markets.
The ISO 9000 family of standards represents an international consensus on good quality management practices. It consists of standards and guidelines related to quality management systems and related supporting standards.
ISO 9001:2000 is the standard that provides a set of standardized requirements for a quality management system, regardless of what the user organization does, its size, or whether it is in the private, or public sector. It is the only standard in the family against which organizations can be certified – although certification is not a compulsory requirement of the standard.
The other standards in the family cover specific aspects such as fundamentals and vocabulary, performance improvements, documentation, training, and financial and economic aspects. Implementing a Quality Management System within an organisation needs to be a decision of top management. The objective of the quality system needs to be clearly defined so that the system can be effective. The design and implementation of quality management system will vary depending on the type, size and products of the organisation and should be used in conjunction with the ISO 9000:2000 standards. Implementing a Quality Management System is not that difficult as it seems, the key is planning and commitment. How complex or simple the QMS is depends entirely on the organisation and what the objectives are. It can be a simple guide to the organisation policy and procedures, or it can document every task and procedure. It really depends on how much risk is involved and how much control is required.
The documentation of QMS involves:
1. The policy to refer to quality, the objectives of quality and the book of quality (Quality Management System)
2. Management Responsibility
3. Resource Management
4. Product Realisation
5. Measurements, Analysis and Improvement
A well managed quality system will have impact on:
1. customer loyalty and repeat business
2. market share
3. operational efficiencies
4. flexibility and ability to respond to market opportunities
5. effective and efficient use of resources
6. cost reductions
7. competitive advantages
- An Romania Perspective
The assurance of quality of the delivered products and services has always represented the main goal of any organisation which wants to be on the market. The concept of „quality” is larger than in the past, referring also to management aspects. Thus, the quality of products and services does not represent only a goal, but a consequence of the quality of the whole managerial activities, workers, and even a quality of partnerships. Modern industrial reorganisations are usually realised through the strategies of quality management, due to the fact that these are able to release the continuous and substantial improvements of the economical agents’ performances.
Within such a frame, one possibility for an organisation to maintain and to gain new positions on a market is to design, to implement and to certificate a Quality Management System (QMS), system through which all processes are controlled.
The Romanian pharmaceutical market is currently restricted as volume and value compared to other countries in the region. Joining the European Union and future improvement of living conditions will mean increase of pharmaceutical expenses per person, considering the fact that the demand for pharmaceutical products (medication) is not influenced by the evolution of prices. After 1990, foreign manufacturers have become interested in the increasing potential of Romania, a country of 22 million inhabitants with a very low intake of drugs per person, due to the low living standard. They have penetrated the market through direct import companies, through license agreements, acquisitions and privatizations.
Romanian manufacturers have tried to shift their direction towards export, but the barrier represented by the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP – for production) and ISO 9001:2000 standards (for distribution) has stopped their penetration of new markets. Their exports mainly targeted Russia, Moldova and former socialist countries. Without norms of this kind, also known as standards, today’s international trade would be inconceivable because every product would have to be checked in keeping with individual criteria. Norms, therefore, create comparability.
Nowadays, the external market has, for several companies, the same importance as the domestic one. The conquest of external market is essential because it brings currency, improves commercial balance, creates new working places and promotes the managerial or technological know-how transfer.
ISO 9000 is a generic name given to a family of standards developed to provide a framework around which a quality management system can be effectively implemented. These standards were developed mainly to facilitate commercial relationships and to increase the confidence of consumers in the capability of a supplier to constantly satisfy the requirements of products and services quality.
The paper presents some advantages achieved by implementation of Quality Management System in pharmaceutical industry, namely S.C. X Company S.A from Tirgu-Mures, one of the most important producer and distributor of pharmaceutical products in Romania.
Using a proven management system combined with ongoing external validation, enables the X Company to continually renew its strategies, domestic and external operations and service level. To this respect, the paper presents the main steps in implementing the Quality Management System within this organisation and some benefits of the registration such as increasing domestic sales, but most off all, the penetration and increasing sales on external markets.
The ISO 9000 family of standards represents an international consensus on good quality management practices. It consists of standards and guidelines related to quality management systems and related supporting standards.
ISO 9001:2000 is the standard that provides a set of standardized requirements for a quality management system, regardless of what the user organization does, its size, or whether it is in the private, or public sector. It is the only standard in the family against which organizations can be certified – although certification is not a compulsory requirement of the standard.
The other standards in the family cover specific aspects such as fundamentals and vocabulary, performance improvements, documentation, training, and financial and economic aspects. Implementing a Quality Management System within an organisation needs to be a decision of top management. The objective of the quality system needs to be clearly defined so that the system can be effective. The design and implementation of quality management system will vary depending on the type, size and products of the organisation and should be used in conjunction with the ISO 9000:2000 standards. Implementing a Quality Management System is not that difficult as it seems, the key is planning and commitment. How complex or simple the QMS is depends entirely on the organisation and what the objectives are. It can be a simple guide to the organisation policy and procedures, or it can document every task and procedure. It really depends on how much risk is involved and how much control is required.
The documentation of QMS involves:
1. The policy to refer to quality, the objectives of quality and the book of quality (Quality Management System)
2. Management Responsibility
3. Resource Management
4. Product Realisation
5. Measurements, Analysis and Improvement
A well managed quality system will have impact on:
1. customer loyalty and repeat business
2. market share
3. operational efficiencies
4. flexibility and ability to respond to market opportunities
5. effective and efficient use of resources
6. cost reductions
7. competitive advantages
ADVANTAGES ACHIEVED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF Quality Management System
ADVANTAGES ACHIEVED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF Quality Management System (QMS)
- An Romania Perspective
The assurance of quality of the delivered products and services has always represented the main goal of any organisation which wants to be on the market. The concept of „quality” is larger than in the past, referring also to management aspects. Thus, the quality of products and services does not represent only a goal, but a consequence of the quality of the whole managerial activities, workers, and even a quality of partnerships. Modern industrial reorganisations are usually realised through the strategies of quality management, due to the fact that these are able to release the continuous and substantial improvements of the economical agents’ performances.
Within such a frame, one possibility for an organisation to maintain and to gain new positions on a market is to design, to implement and to certificate a Quality Management System (QMS), system through which all processes are controlled.
The Romanian pharmaceutical market is currently restricted as volume and value compared to other countries in the region. Joining the European Union and future improvement of living conditions will mean increase of pharmaceutical expenses per person, considering the fact that the demand for pharmaceutical products (medication) is not influenced by the evolution of prices. After 1990, foreign manufacturers have become interested in the increasing potential of Romania, a country of 22 million inhabitants with a very low intake of drugs per person, due to the low living standard. They have penetrated the market through direct import companies, through license agreements, acquisitions and privatizations.
Romanian manufacturers have tried to shift their direction towards export, but the barrier represented by the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP – for production) and ISO 9001:2000 standards (for distribution) has stopped their penetration of new markets. Their exports mainly targeted Russia, Moldova and former socialist countries. Without norms of this kind, also known as standards, today’s international trade would be inconceivable because every product would have to be checked in keeping with individual criteria. Norms, therefore, create comparability.
Nowadays, the external market has, for several companies, the same importance as the domestic one. The conquest of external market is essential because it brings currency, improves commercial balance, creates new working places and promotes the managerial or technological know-how transfer.
ISO 9000 is a generic name given to a family of standards developed to provide a framework around which a quality management system can be effectively implemented. These standards were developed mainly to facilitate commercial relationships and to increase the confidence of consumers in the capability of a supplier to constantly satisfy the requirements of products and services quality.
The paper presents some advantages achieved by implementation of Quality Management System in pharmaceutical industry, namely S.C. X Company S.A from Tirgu-Mures, one of the most important producer and distributor of pharmaceutical products in Romania.
Using a proven management system combined with ongoing external validation, enables the X Company to continually renew its strategies, domestic and external operations and service level. To this respect, the paper presents the main steps in implementing the Quality Management System within this organisation and some benefits of the registration such as increasing domestic sales, but most off all, the penetration and increasing sales on external markets.
The ISO 9000 family of standards represents an international consensus on good quality management practices. It consists of standards and guidelines related to quality management systems and related supporting standards.
ISO 9001:2000 is the standard that provides a set of standardized requirements for a quality management system, regardless of what the user organization does, its size, or whether it is in the private, or public sector. It is the only standard in the family against which organizations can be certified – although certification is not a compulsory requirement of the standard.
The other standards in the family cover specific aspects such as fundamentals and vocabulary, performance improvements, documentation, training, and financial and economic aspects. Implementing a Quality Management System within an organisation needs to be a decision of top management. The objective of the quality system needs to be clearly defined so that the system can be effective. The design and implementation of quality management system will vary depending on the type, size and products of the organisation and should be used in conjunction with the ISO 9000:2000 standards. Implementing a Quality Management System is not that difficult as it seems, the key is planning and commitment. How complex or simple the QMS is depends entirely on the organisation and what the objectives are. It can be a simple guide to the organisation policy and procedures, or it can document every task and procedure. It really depends on how much risk is involved and how much control is required.
The documentation of QMS involves:
1. The policy to refer to quality, the objectives of quality and the book of quality (Quality Management System)
2. Management Responsibility
3. Resource Management
4. Product Realisation
5. Measurements, Analysis and Improvement
A well managed quality system will have impact on:
1. customer loyalty and repeat business
2. market share
3. operational efficiencies
4. flexibility and ability to respond to market opportunities
5. effective and efficient use of resources
6. cost reductions
7. competitive advantages
- An Romania Perspective
The assurance of quality of the delivered products and services has always represented the main goal of any organisation which wants to be on the market. The concept of „quality” is larger than in the past, referring also to management aspects. Thus, the quality of products and services does not represent only a goal, but a consequence of the quality of the whole managerial activities, workers, and even a quality of partnerships. Modern industrial reorganisations are usually realised through the strategies of quality management, due to the fact that these are able to release the continuous and substantial improvements of the economical agents’ performances.
Within such a frame, one possibility for an organisation to maintain and to gain new positions on a market is to design, to implement and to certificate a Quality Management System (QMS), system through which all processes are controlled.
The Romanian pharmaceutical market is currently restricted as volume and value compared to other countries in the region. Joining the European Union and future improvement of living conditions will mean increase of pharmaceutical expenses per person, considering the fact that the demand for pharmaceutical products (medication) is not influenced by the evolution of prices. After 1990, foreign manufacturers have become interested in the increasing potential of Romania, a country of 22 million inhabitants with a very low intake of drugs per person, due to the low living standard. They have penetrated the market through direct import companies, through license agreements, acquisitions and privatizations.
Romanian manufacturers have tried to shift their direction towards export, but the barrier represented by the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP – for production) and ISO 9001:2000 standards (for distribution) has stopped their penetration of new markets. Their exports mainly targeted Russia, Moldova and former socialist countries. Without norms of this kind, also known as standards, today’s international trade would be inconceivable because every product would have to be checked in keeping with individual criteria. Norms, therefore, create comparability.
Nowadays, the external market has, for several companies, the same importance as the domestic one. The conquest of external market is essential because it brings currency, improves commercial balance, creates new working places and promotes the managerial or technological know-how transfer.
ISO 9000 is a generic name given to a family of standards developed to provide a framework around which a quality management system can be effectively implemented. These standards were developed mainly to facilitate commercial relationships and to increase the confidence of consumers in the capability of a supplier to constantly satisfy the requirements of products and services quality.
The paper presents some advantages achieved by implementation of Quality Management System in pharmaceutical industry, namely S.C. X Company S.A from Tirgu-Mures, one of the most important producer and distributor of pharmaceutical products in Romania.
Using a proven management system combined with ongoing external validation, enables the X Company to continually renew its strategies, domestic and external operations and service level. To this respect, the paper presents the main steps in implementing the Quality Management System within this organisation and some benefits of the registration such as increasing domestic sales, but most off all, the penetration and increasing sales on external markets.
The ISO 9000 family of standards represents an international consensus on good quality management practices. It consists of standards and guidelines related to quality management systems and related supporting standards.
ISO 9001:2000 is the standard that provides a set of standardized requirements for a quality management system, regardless of what the user organization does, its size, or whether it is in the private, or public sector. It is the only standard in the family against which organizations can be certified – although certification is not a compulsory requirement of the standard.
The other standards in the family cover specific aspects such as fundamentals and vocabulary, performance improvements, documentation, training, and financial and economic aspects. Implementing a Quality Management System within an organisation needs to be a decision of top management. The objective of the quality system needs to be clearly defined so that the system can be effective. The design and implementation of quality management system will vary depending on the type, size and products of the organisation and should be used in conjunction with the ISO 9000:2000 standards. Implementing a Quality Management System is not that difficult as it seems, the key is planning and commitment. How complex or simple the QMS is depends entirely on the organisation and what the objectives are. It can be a simple guide to the organisation policy and procedures, or it can document every task and procedure. It really depends on how much risk is involved and how much control is required.
The documentation of QMS involves:
1. The policy to refer to quality, the objectives of quality and the book of quality (Quality Management System)
2. Management Responsibility
3. Resource Management
4. Product Realisation
5. Measurements, Analysis and Improvement
A well managed quality system will have impact on:
1. customer loyalty and repeat business
2. market share
3. operational efficiencies
4. flexibility and ability to respond to market opportunities
5. effective and efficient use of resources
6. cost reductions
7. competitive advantages
ISO 9001 Standards – Documented Procedures
ISO 9001 Standards – Documented Procedures
The standard requires the management system documentation to include documented procedures required by ISO 9001 Standards.
ISO 9000 defines a procedure as a specified way to carry out an activity or a process. This definition is ambiguous because an activity is on a different scale than a process. Process outputs are dependent upon many factors of which activities are but one. An activity is the smallest unit of work. Several activities accomplish a task and several tasks reflect the stages in a process but there is more to a process than a series of tasks. This definition also esults in a belief that procedures are documented processes but this too is inaccurate. Procedures tell us how to proceed don‘t need to produce any others. The specific procedures required are:
(a) A documented procedure for document control
(b) A documented procedure for the control of records
(c) A documented procedure for conducting audits
(d) A documented procedure for nonconformity control
(e) A documented procedure for corrective action
(f) A documented procedure for preventive action
These areas all have something in common. They are what the authors of the early drafts of ISO 9000 :2008 referred to as system procedures ? they apply to the whole system and are not product, process or customer specific although it is not uncommon for customers to specify requirements that would impact these areas. Why procedures for these aspects are required and not for other aspects of the management system is unclear but it seems that the authors of ISO 9000 felt these were not processes ? a conclusion I find difficult to justify.
They are certainly not business processes but could be work processes. However, there is another message that this requirement conveys. It is that procedures are not required for each clause of the standard. Previously, countless organizations produced a manual of 20 procedures to match the 20 elements of ISO 9001. Some limited their procedures to the 26 procedures cited by the standard and others produced as many as were necessary to respond to the requirements.
Document control is a work process or a number of work processes because the inputs pass through a number of stages each adding value to result in the achievement of defined objectives. These are the acquisition, approval, publication, distribution, storage, maintenance, improvement, and disposal stages. These are not tasks but processes that achieve defined objectives and involve both physical, financial and human resources. Within these processes are tasks, each of which may require documented procedures as they are initiated.
Control of records is also a work process similar to document control. There are the preparation, storage, access, maintenance and disposal stages. This is not one uninterrupted flow but a life cycle. There is not one task but several performed at different times for different reasons.
Auditing is certainly a process with a defined objective. Without the provision of competent personnel and a suitable environment, audits will not achieve their objectives no matter how many times the procedure is implemented.
Nonconformity control like records control is a work process for the same reasons. The sequence of tasks is not in the form of an uninterrupted sequence. The sequence of stages may be identification, documentation, segregation, review, remedial action and disposal but this is not a continuous sequence. There are breaks and different procedures may apply at each stage depending on what it is that is nonconforming.
There is little merit in having one corrective action procedure when the source of problems that require corrective action is so varied. One Corrective Action Form might be appropriate but its application will be so varied that it is questionable whether one size fits all. Presenting top management with a nonconformity report because it has been detected that the organization charts are not promptly updated following a change, will not motivate them into action. Corrective action forms part of every process rather than being a separate process. It is unreasonable to force all actions aimed at preventing the recurrence of problems through one process. Many problems are prevented from recurring not by following a procedure, but by the designer, the producer, supplier, manager remembering they had a problem last time and doing it differently the next ? i.e. they learn from their mistakes. No forms filled in, no procedures followed ? just people using their initiative ? this is why corrective action is part of every process operation.
Preventive action remains one of the most misunderstood requirements of ISO 9001 because it is mistaken for corrective action but more on this. There is even less justification for one preventive action procedure because the source of potential problems is so varied. Preventive actions are taken in design, in planning, in training and in maintenance under the name of FMEA, Reliability Prediction, Quality Planning, Production Planning, Logistic Planning, Staff Development, Equipment Maintenance ? preventive actions are built into these processes and similar to corrective action are part of every process design.
The standard requires the management system documentation to include documented procedures required by ISO 9001 Standards.
ISO 9000 defines a procedure as a specified way to carry out an activity or a process. This definition is ambiguous because an activity is on a different scale than a process. Process outputs are dependent upon many factors of which activities are but one. An activity is the smallest unit of work. Several activities accomplish a task and several tasks reflect the stages in a process but there is more to a process than a series of tasks. This definition also esults in a belief that procedures are documented processes but this too is inaccurate. Procedures tell us how to proceed don‘t need to produce any others. The specific procedures required are:
(a) A documented procedure for document control
(b) A documented procedure for the control of records
(c) A documented procedure for conducting audits
(d) A documented procedure for nonconformity control
(e) A documented procedure for corrective action
(f) A documented procedure for preventive action
These areas all have something in common. They are what the authors of the early drafts of ISO 9000 :2008 referred to as system procedures ? they apply to the whole system and are not product, process or customer specific although it is not uncommon for customers to specify requirements that would impact these areas. Why procedures for these aspects are required and not for other aspects of the management system is unclear but it seems that the authors of ISO 9000 felt these were not processes ? a conclusion I find difficult to justify.
They are certainly not business processes but could be work processes. However, there is another message that this requirement conveys. It is that procedures are not required for each clause of the standard. Previously, countless organizations produced a manual of 20 procedures to match the 20 elements of ISO 9001. Some limited their procedures to the 26 procedures cited by the standard and others produced as many as were necessary to respond to the requirements.
Document control is a work process or a number of work processes because the inputs pass through a number of stages each adding value to result in the achievement of defined objectives. These are the acquisition, approval, publication, distribution, storage, maintenance, improvement, and disposal stages. These are not tasks but processes that achieve defined objectives and involve both physical, financial and human resources. Within these processes are tasks, each of which may require documented procedures as they are initiated.
Control of records is also a work process similar to document control. There are the preparation, storage, access, maintenance and disposal stages. This is not one uninterrupted flow but a life cycle. There is not one task but several performed at different times for different reasons.
Auditing is certainly a process with a defined objective. Without the provision of competent personnel and a suitable environment, audits will not achieve their objectives no matter how many times the procedure is implemented.
Nonconformity control like records control is a work process for the same reasons. The sequence of tasks is not in the form of an uninterrupted sequence. The sequence of stages may be identification, documentation, segregation, review, remedial action and disposal but this is not a continuous sequence. There are breaks and different procedures may apply at each stage depending on what it is that is nonconforming.
There is little merit in having one corrective action procedure when the source of problems that require corrective action is so varied. One Corrective Action Form might be appropriate but its application will be so varied that it is questionable whether one size fits all. Presenting top management with a nonconformity report because it has been detected that the organization charts are not promptly updated following a change, will not motivate them into action. Corrective action forms part of every process rather than being a separate process. It is unreasonable to force all actions aimed at preventing the recurrence of problems through one process. Many problems are prevented from recurring not by following a procedure, but by the designer, the producer, supplier, manager remembering they had a problem last time and doing it differently the next ? i.e. they learn from their mistakes. No forms filled in, no procedures followed ? just people using their initiative ? this is why corrective action is part of every process operation.
Preventive action remains one of the most misunderstood requirements of ISO 9001 because it is mistaken for corrective action but more on this. There is even less justification for one preventive action procedure because the source of potential problems is so varied. Preventive actions are taken in design, in planning, in training and in maintenance under the name of FMEA, Reliability Prediction, Quality Planning, Production Planning, Logistic Planning, Staff Development, Equipment Maintenance ? preventive actions are built into these processes and similar to corrective action are part of every process design.
Continual improvement in the quality management system
Continual Improvement In The Quality Management System
The ISO 9001 standard requires the organization to continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001 and to implement action necessary to achieve planned results and continual improvement of the identified processes.
ISO 9000 defines continual improvement as a recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements. As the organization’s objectives are its requirements, continually improving the effectiveness of the quality management system means continually increasing the ability of the organization to fulfil its objectives.
If the performance of a process parameter is currently meeting the standard that has been established, there are several improvement actions you can take:
Raise the standard e.g. if the norm for the sales ratio of orders won to all orders bid is 60%, an improvement programme could be developed for raising the standard to 75% or higher
Increase efficiency e.g. if the time to process an order is within limits, identify and eliminate wasted resources
Increase effectiveness e.g. if you bid against all customer requests, by only bidding for those you know you can win you improve your hit rate
You can call all these actions improvement actions because they clearly improve performance. However, we need to distinguish between being better at what we do now and doing new things. Some may argue that improving efficiency is being better at what we do now, and so it is – but if in order to improve efficiency we have to be innovative we are truly reaching new standards. Forty years ago, supervisors in industry would cut an eraser in half in the name of efficiency rather than hand out two erasers. Clearly this was a lack of trust disguised as efficiency improvement and it had quite the opposite effect. In fact they were not only increasing waste but also creating a hostile environment.
Each of the improvement actions is dealt with later in the book and the subject of continual improvement addressed again under Quality planning.
There are several steps to undertaking continual improvement:
1. Determine current performance
2 Establish the need for change
3 Obtain commitment and define the improvement objectives
4 Organize diagnostic resources
5 Carry out research and analysis to discover the cause of current performance
6 Define and test solutions that will accomplish the improvement objectives
7 Product improvement plans which specify how and by whom the changes will be implemented
8 Identify and overcome any resistance to change
9 Implement the change
10 Put in place controls to hold new levels of performance and repeat step one
For more information, please visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us
The ISO 9001 standard requires the organization to continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001 and to implement action necessary to achieve planned results and continual improvement of the identified processes.
ISO 9000 defines continual improvement as a recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements. As the organization’s objectives are its requirements, continually improving the effectiveness of the quality management system means continually increasing the ability of the organization to fulfil its objectives.
If the performance of a process parameter is currently meeting the standard that has been established, there are several improvement actions you can take:
Raise the standard e.g. if the norm for the sales ratio of orders won to all orders bid is 60%, an improvement programme could be developed for raising the standard to 75% or higher
Increase efficiency e.g. if the time to process an order is within limits, identify and eliminate wasted resources
Increase effectiveness e.g. if you bid against all customer requests, by only bidding for those you know you can win you improve your hit rate
You can call all these actions improvement actions because they clearly improve performance. However, we need to distinguish between being better at what we do now and doing new things. Some may argue that improving efficiency is being better at what we do now, and so it is – but if in order to improve efficiency we have to be innovative we are truly reaching new standards. Forty years ago, supervisors in industry would cut an eraser in half in the name of efficiency rather than hand out two erasers. Clearly this was a lack of trust disguised as efficiency improvement and it had quite the opposite effect. In fact they were not only increasing waste but also creating a hostile environment.
Each of the improvement actions is dealt with later in the book and the subject of continual improvement addressed again under Quality planning.
There are several steps to undertaking continual improvement:
1. Determine current performance
2 Establish the need for change
3 Obtain commitment and define the improvement objectives
4 Organize diagnostic resources
5 Carry out research and analysis to discover the cause of current performance
6 Define and test solutions that will accomplish the improvement objectives
7 Product improvement plans which specify how and by whom the changes will be implemented
8 Identify and overcome any resistance to change
9 Implement the change
10 Put in place controls to hold new levels of performance and repeat step one
For more information, please visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us
Preparing ISO 9001 Quality Manual
Preparing ISO 9001 Quality Manual
The standard requires a quality manual to be established and maintained that includes the scope of the quality management system, the documented procedures or reference to them and a description of the sequence and interaction of processes included in the quality management system.
ISO 9001 defines a quality manual as a document specifying the quality management system of an organization. It is therefore not intended that the quality manual be a response to the requirements of ISO 9001. As the top-level document describing the management system it is a system description describing how the organization is managed.
Countless quality manuals produced to satisfy ISO 9001:2008, were no more than 20 sections that paraphrased the requirements of the standard. Such documentation adds no value. They are of no use to managers, staff or auditors. Often thought to be useful to customers, organizations would gain no more confidence from customers than would be obtained from their registration certificate.
A description of the management system is necessary as a means of showing how all the processes are interconnected and how they collectively deliver the business outputs. It has several uses as :
1. a means to communicate the vision, values, mission, policies and objectives of the organization
2. a means of showing how the system has been designed
3. a means of showing linkages between processes
4. a means of showing who does what an aid to training new people
5. a tool in the analysis of potential improvements
6. a means of demonstrating compliance with external standards and regulations
When formulating the policies, objectives and identifying the processes to achieve them, the manual provides a convenient vehicle for containing such information. If left as separate pieces of information, it may be more difficult to see the linkages.
The requirement provides the framework for the quality manual. Its content may therefore include the following:
1 Introduction
(a) Purpose (of the manual)
(b) Scope (of the manual)
(c) Applicability (of the manual)
(d) Definitions (of terms used in the manual)
2 Business overview
(a) Nature of the business/organization – its scope of activity, its products and services
(b) The organization’s interested parties (customers, employees, regulators, shareholders, suppliers, owners etc.)
(c) The context diagram showing the organization relative to its external environment
(d) Vision, values
(e) Mission
3 Organization
(a) Function descriptions
(b) Organization chart
(c) Locations with scope of activity
4 Business processes
(a) The system model showing the key business processes and how they are interconnected
(b) System performance indicators and method of measurement
(c) Business planning process description
(d) Resource management process description
(e) Marketing process description
(f) Product/service generation processes description
(g) Sales process description
(h) Order fulfilment process description
5 Function matrix (Relationship of functions to processes)
6 Location matrix (Relationship of locations to processes)
7 Requirement deployment matrices
(a) ISO 9001 compliance matrix
(b) ISO 14001 compliance matrix
(c) Regulation compliance matrices (FDA, Environment, Health, Safety, CAA etc.)
8 Approvals (List of current product, process and system approvals)
The process descriptions can be contained in separate documents and should cover the topics identified previously (see Documents that ensure effective planning, operation and control of processes ).
As the quality manual contains a description of the management system a more apt title would be a Management System Manual (MSM) or maybe a title reflecting its purpose might be Management System Description (MSD).
In addition a much smaller document could be produced that does respond to the requirements of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and the regulations of regulatory authorities. Each document would be an exposition produced purely to map your management system onto these external requirements to demonstrate how your system meets these requirements. When a new requirement comes along, you can produce a new exposition rather than attempt to change your system to suit all parties. A model of such relationships is illustrated in Figure 4.10. The process descriptions that emerge from the Management System Manual describe the core business processes and are addressed in Chapter 4 under the heading of Documents that ensure effective operation and control of processes.
The standard requires a quality manual to be established and maintained that includes the scope of the quality management system, the documented procedures or reference to them and a description of the sequence and interaction of processes included in the quality management system.
ISO 9001 defines a quality manual as a document specifying the quality management system of an organization. It is therefore not intended that the quality manual be a response to the requirements of ISO 9001. As the top-level document describing the management system it is a system description describing how the organization is managed.
Countless quality manuals produced to satisfy ISO 9001:2008, were no more than 20 sections that paraphrased the requirements of the standard. Such documentation adds no value. They are of no use to managers, staff or auditors. Often thought to be useful to customers, organizations would gain no more confidence from customers than would be obtained from their registration certificate.
A description of the management system is necessary as a means of showing how all the processes are interconnected and how they collectively deliver the business outputs. It has several uses as :
1. a means to communicate the vision, values, mission, policies and objectives of the organization
2. a means of showing how the system has been designed
3. a means of showing linkages between processes
4. a means of showing who does what an aid to training new people
5. a tool in the analysis of potential improvements
6. a means of demonstrating compliance with external standards and regulations
When formulating the policies, objectives and identifying the processes to achieve them, the manual provides a convenient vehicle for containing such information. If left as separate pieces of information, it may be more difficult to see the linkages.
The requirement provides the framework for the quality manual. Its content may therefore include the following:
1 Introduction
(a) Purpose (of the manual)
(b) Scope (of the manual)
(c) Applicability (of the manual)
(d) Definitions (of terms used in the manual)
2 Business overview
(a) Nature of the business/organization – its scope of activity, its products and services
(b) The organization’s interested parties (customers, employees, regulators, shareholders, suppliers, owners etc.)
(c) The context diagram showing the organization relative to its external environment
(d) Vision, values
(e) Mission
3 Organization
(a) Function descriptions
(b) Organization chart
(c) Locations with scope of activity
4 Business processes
(a) The system model showing the key business processes and how they are interconnected
(b) System performance indicators and method of measurement
(c) Business planning process description
(d) Resource management process description
(e) Marketing process description
(f) Product/service generation processes description
(g) Sales process description
(h) Order fulfilment process description
5 Function matrix (Relationship of functions to processes)
6 Location matrix (Relationship of locations to processes)
7 Requirement deployment matrices
(a) ISO 9001 compliance matrix
(b) ISO 14001 compliance matrix
(c) Regulation compliance matrices (FDA, Environment, Health, Safety, CAA etc.)
8 Approvals (List of current product, process and system approvals)
The process descriptions can be contained in separate documents and should cover the topics identified previously (see Documents that ensure effective planning, operation and control of processes ).
As the quality manual contains a description of the management system a more apt title would be a Management System Manual (MSM) or maybe a title reflecting its purpose might be Management System Description (MSD).
In addition a much smaller document could be produced that does respond to the requirements of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and the regulations of regulatory authorities. Each document would be an exposition produced purely to map your management system onto these external requirements to demonstrate how your system meets these requirements. When a new requirement comes along, you can produce a new exposition rather than attempt to change your system to suit all parties. A model of such relationships is illustrated in Figure 4.10. The process descriptions that emerge from the Management System Manual describe the core business processes and are addressed in Chapter 4 under the heading of Documents that ensure effective operation and control of processes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)