Saturday, December 26, 2009
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards
Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards
The requirement to establish a procedure for periodically evaluating compliance with applicable legal and other requirements falls short of specifically requiring regulatory compliance audits but, in fact, a system of regular regulatory compliance audits may be the most practical means for meeting this requirement of the standard. In the U.S., determination of whether to conduct a compliance audit will be governed in part by the particular jurisdiction’s approach to allowing a legal privilege for the self-assessment audit.
Evaluation vs. Audit – The difference between an evaluation and audit can only be determined by looking outside of ISO 14001. Consulting a dictionary reveals that an evaluation involves a determination of value or worth and that an audit is an examination of accounts done by persons appointed for the purpose. A better definition `is the more specific ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing, which defines an audit as a “systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled.” Many organizations do not have a system for evaluating regulatory compliance other than their own records and the inspections of regulatory officials. This lack of a verification system can be a risky way to operate. Reports of enforcement actions and consent agreements show that many organizations are blindsided by rogue employees who violate rules and falsify documents to cover up environmental misdeeds. Although ISO 14001 does not prescribe a specific approach to evaluation of regulatory compliance, organizations should consider methods for going beyond verification of records by collecting and evaluating physical evidence.
ISO 9000 Standards – Document Approval
ISO 9000 Standards – Document Approval
The ISO 9000 Standards requires that documents be approved for adequacy prior to issue.
Approval prior to issue means that designated authorities have agreed the document before being made available for use. Whilst the term ade-
quacy is a little vague it should be taken as meaning that the document is judged as fit for the intended purpose. In a paper based system, this means approval before the document is distributed. With an electronic system, it means that the documents should be approved before they are published or made available to the user community.
The ISO 9000 Standards document control process needs to define the process by which documents are approved. In some cases it may not be necessary for anyone other than the approval authority to examine the documents. In others it may be necessary to set up a panel of reviewers to solicit their comments before approval is given.
It all depends on whether the approval authority has all the information
needed to make the decision and is therefore ‘competent’. One might think that the CEO could approve any document in the organization but just because a person is the most senior executive does not mean he or she is competent to perform any role in the organization.
Users should be the prime participants in the approval process so that the
resultant documents reflect their needs and are fit for the intended purpose. If the objective is stated in the document, does it fulfil that objective? If it is stated that the document applies to certain equipment, area or activity, does it cover that equipment, area or activity to the depth expected of such a document? One of the difficulties in soliciting comments to documents is that you will gather comment on what you have written but not on what you have omitted. A useful method is to ensure that the procedures requiring the document specify the acceptance criteria so that the reviewers and approvers can check the document against an agreed standard.
To demonstrate documents have been deemed as adequate prior to issue,
you will need to show that the document has been processed through the
prescribed document approval process. Where there is a review panel, a simple method is to employ a standard comment sheet on which reviewers can indicate their comments or signify that they have no comment. During the drafting process you may undertake several revisions. You may feel it
necessary to retain these in case of dispute later, but you are not required to do so. You also need to show that the current issue has been reviewed so your comment sheets need to indicate document issue status.
Documents That Ensure Effective Planning, Operation And Control
Documents That Ensure Effective Planning, Operation And Control
The ISO 9000 standard requires management system documentation to include documents required by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes.
The documents required for effective planning, operation and control of the processes would include several different types of documents. Some will be
product and process specific and others will be common to all processes. Rather than stipulate the documents that are needed, ISO 9000 Standards now provides for the organization to decide what it needs for the effective operation and control of its processes. This phrase is the key to determining the documents that are needed.
There are three types of controlled documents, namely:
- Policies and practices (these include process descriptions, control procedures, guides, operating procedures and internal standards)
- Documents derived from these policies and practices, such as drawings,
specifications, plans, work instructions, technical procedures and reports
- External documents referenced in either of the above
There will always be exceptions to this model but in general the majority of
documents used in a management system can be classified in this way.
Derived documents are those that are derived by executing processes;
for example, audit reports result from using the audit process, drawings result from using the design process, procurement specifications result from using the procurement process. There are, however, two types of derived document:
prescriptive and descriptive documents. Prescriptive documents are those that prescribe requirements, instructions, guidance etc. and may be subject to change. They have issue status and approval status, and are implemented in doing work. Descriptive documents result from doing work and are not
implemented. They may have issue and approval status. Specifications, plans, purchase orders, drawings are all prescriptive whereas audit reports, test reports, inspection records are all descriptive. This distinction is only necessary because the controls required will be different for each class of documents.
The History Of ISO 14001 Environmental Management System
The History Establishment Of ISO 14001 Environmental Management System
Environmental management began in earnest around 1970 as a direct result of environmental catastrophes and governmental reaction to those catastrophes. In many countries, environmental regulations that focus on control of environmentally damaging emissions to air, discharges to water, and disposal of hazardous wastes were instituted in an effort to prevent future environmental catastrophes and to limit toxic releases to the environment. Regulations, however, too often had the effect of placing a ceiling on environmental performance. Many industrial organizations, reacting negatively to governmental environmental regulations that
they view as being based on bad science, adding unnecessary costs, or making them uncompetitive in international markets, have restricted their environmental management efforts to complying with regulations and nothing morIn response, global institutions, recognizing the interconnected problems of persistent environmental degradation, growing economic divisions, and associated poverty and hunger, developed programs to begin to bring economic and social goals into balance with ecological and natural resource preservation. In 1992, the Global Environmental Summit, convened in Rio de Janeiro by the United Nations, brought representatives of 178 nations together to endorse Agenda 21: The Program of Action for Sustainable Development. Agenda 21 details the actions that are necessary on the part of organizations of all kinds if sustainability is to be achieved and collapse of economic, environmental, and social systems is to be avoided.
A second global summit, the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), was held in Johannesburg in Summer 2002. In tabulating the results since the Rio summit, the WSSD determined that all environmental trends had experienced further degradation and that the only sustainability gains to be reported were progress against infectious diseases, the global literacy rate, and the greater inclusion of women in society’s activities. The significance of Rio is that it marks the time when much of the world realized that we cannot continue on the same path we have been on. The significance of Johannesburg is the realization that, in spite of enormous effort on the part of many institutions, humankind is losing the battle for sustainability.
ISO 14001 is the EMS Specification developed by the international Organization for Standardization (ISO) of Geneva, Switzerland as a part of the ISO 14000 series ofenvironmental management documents. It was issued as both an International and American National Standard in September 1996. The Second Edition of ISO 14001, ISO 14001:2004, was issued as an International Standard on November 15, 2004 and subsequently as an American National Standard.
ISO 14001 establishes a framework for the conduct of environmental management by requiring the organization to define an Environmental Policy and establish sixteen management procedures that support the policy. Many of the ISO 14001 procedures already exist in some form within organizations and only require modification to meet the requirements of ISO 14001. Other procedures have to be added in their entirety. All of the ISO 14001 procedures represent best management practices as defined by a consensus of the representatives of more than 50 national standards bodies and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) who participated in the development of ISO 14001:1996 from early 1993 through July 1, 1995 and in
the development of the Second Edition from early 2002 until mid-2004.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)